Blog Article

Drei Personen an einem Tisch, auf dem Tablet und Diagramme liegen
MaRisk Compliance in Practice: How Segregation of Duties Reduces Risk

Digitalization, stricter regulatory requirements, and increasing cyber threats are putting IT and compliance officers in the financial sector under pressure. Manual documentation, high process costs from recurring risk assessments, and cybersecurity concerns are major challenges. The Minimum Requirements for Risk Management (MaRisk) set by BaFin require all institutions to establish effective Segregation of Duties (SoD) – a key component for audit readiness and the protection of core business operations. This article explains how to implement Segregation of Duties in line with MaRisk efficiently and future-proof your organization.

Find out more

Definition: What Is MaRisk?

The Minimum Requirements for Risk Management (MaRisk) form the central regulatory framework issued by BaFin (German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority) for credit and financial service institutions in Germany. MaRisk specifies the requirements of § 25a of the German Governance Banking Act (Kreditwesengesetz – KWG), offering a flexible and practical approach to risk management.


Objectives of MaRisk

  • Protect customer assets and interests

  • Ensure the institution’s risk-bearing capacity

  • Prevent conflicts of interest and compliance violations

  • Strengthen internal control systems (ICS) and governance structures

Segregation of Duties Under MaRisk: What It Means and Why It Matters

Segregation of Duties (SoD) is a core element of the internal control system and explicitly required by MaRisk. It ensures that incompatible tasks – such as initiating and controlling transactions – are performed by different individuals. This structure makes compliance with MaRisk verifiable and reduces operational and fraud risks measurably.


Goals of Segregation of Duties

  • Avoid conflicts of interest

  • Reduce error and fraud risk

  • Ensure objective risk assessments

  • Provide transparent compliance for regulators and auditors


Typical Examples

Business Area

SoD Required Between

Objective

Credit Business

Front Office (Sales) and Back Office (Verification)

Independent credit decisions

Trading

Trading and Risk Control / Settlement

Prevent manipulation, ensure independent oversight

IT and Access Rights

Provisioning, Control, and Recertification

Protect against unauthorized access, enhance cybersecurity

MaRisk, BAIT, VAIT, and DORA: How the Frameworks Interconnect

  • MaRisk: Overarching requirements for risk management and organizational structure, including SoD

  • BAIT – Supervisory Requirements for IT in Financial Institutions: Extends MaRisk with IT-specific obligations, including Identity Governance & Administration (IGA) and Identity & Access Management (IAM)

  • VAIT – Supervisory Requirements for IT in Insurance Undertakings: Equivalent requirements for insurers

  • DORA – Digital Operational Resilience Act: EU-wide regulation ensuring digital and cyber resilience

These frameworks reinforce each other, all relying on Segregation of Duties as a key control principle.

Important to know: DORA will gradually supersede BAIT and VAIT in relevant areas and complement or overlap MaRisk in IT resilience. According to BaFin: “With the direct application of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA), BAIT and VAIT will be replaced in affected areas. National regulations will be adapted accordingly.”

Furthermore, under the Financial Market Digitalization Act (FinmadiG), from January 1, 2027, additional institutions will be required to apply DORA, while BAIT will be fully repealed by December 31, 2026.

How to Implement SoD Under MaRisk Efficiently

Example Scenario: A mid-sized bank faces challenges in meeting MaRisk SoD requirements within IT. Manual documentation and access management are error-prone and resource-intensive.

The Solution

  • Implement a centralized Identity Governance & Administration (IGA) system such as Garancy

  • Define incompatible role combinations using an SoD matrix

  • Automate access review and documentation processes

  • Perform regular recertifications and staff training

  • Integrate third-party applications into the central access management framework

Benefits

  • Reduced manual effort and process costs

  • Auditable MaRisk compliance for auditors and regulators

  • Lower risk through clear accountability and automated controls

Challenges and Best Practices in MaRisk Compliance

Common Pain Points

  • Complex and heterogeneous process landscapes

  • High manual documentation overhead

  • Lack of transparency in roles and permissions

  • Resistance to organizational change

Best Practices

  • Involve key stakeholders early

  • Define clear role and access management concepts

  • Use modern IGA and IAM tools

  • Provide continuous employee training and awareness programs

  • Utilize proportionality clauses for smaller institutions

Conclusion: Segregation of Duties as the Key to Audit Readiness and Resilient Processes

MaRisk compliance through effective Segregation of Duties is not just a regulatory requirement – it’s a strategic enabler. It minimizes risk, strengthens compliance, and optimizes processes. In times of digital transformation and skill shortages, automated IGA and IAM solutions offer the opportunity to reduce costs while meeting supervisory requirements efficiently and sustainably.


Get Expert Advice

Want to learn how to implement Segregation of Duties under MaRisk efficiently and audit-ready in your organization? Get in touch with our IAM specialists for a no-obligation consultation. Send us a message and we will respond to you shortly. We look forward to hearing from you!

Find out more

Author

Beta Systems Mitarbeiterin Franziska Weiß
Franziska Weiß
Evangelist

Tags

Access GovernanceAudit-ProofIAMIT SecuritySegregation of Duties

Share

Further Resources

Blog Article
Mehrere Hände, die Puzzleteile halten, als Symbolbild für Segregation of Duties (Funktionstrennung)

Segregation of Duties: SoD Policies for Secure and Efficient IT Operations in SMEs

In today’s digital and regulatory landscape, medium-sized businesses face mounting pressure to protect themselves from fraud, errors, and reputational damage. Recent high-profile incidents have underscored the risks of inadequate internal controls, leaving many IT leaders anxious about their own vulnerabilities. One proven strategy stands out: Segregation of Duties (SoD). But what exactly does this mean, and how can your organization implement SoD to address your most pressing business pain points? This article provides clarity, practical guidance, and actionable steps for IT professionals seeking to safeguard operations and ensure compliance – so your company can focus on its core business.
Whitepaper
Beta Systems Whitepaper KPMG Segregation of Duties Cover EN

Segregation of Duties: Proper Implementation of Critical Compliance Requirements

Explore the essential drivers and requirements for segregation of functions in our detailed whitepaper, drafted in collaboration with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft. This comprehensive guide not only covers legal mandates and administrative directives but also highlights the internal interests that support a clean segregation of functions within a company.
Analyst Report
2025-ema-analyst-report.jpg

Download the EMA Radar Report 2025: Get the Full Profile of ANOW!® Suite by Beta Systems

Discover why ANOW!® Suite by Beta Systems ranked number one in the Enterprise Management Associates Radar Report for Workload Automation and Orchestration 2025 for the fourth consecutive time, with top scores in Product Strength and Deployment Cost Efficiency and special recognition for observability‑enabled automation. Beta Systems is recognized by analysts for its pioneering approach—infusing observability and AI into orchestration and setting a new benchmark for advanced workload automation platforms.